a paper -- essays research papers

Response Paper 1The reading materials in Week 6 explore the impact of planetary law on states, and more specifically, state looks. The idea is not to oversimplify the influence of international law but to understand in what circumstances (under various theories) would the statutory framework and rules of international society shape and limit the behavior of nations and their alternatives. And these allow in many scenarios that constitute a change in state behavior such as abstaining from invasion to imposing tariffs. One notes that state actions argon primarily motivated by state interests. A state power uphold international law or norms because it is advantageous to its interest or even when it comes as a great sacrifice. The readings offer several theories hypothesizing why states might or might not conform to international law.From a state psychology point of view, Politics of Law Observance suggests that well-nigh states may not observe the law because of a priori assumpti on of how new(prenominal) nations would behave. For instance if country A does not feel that the international confederation will impose threatening sanctions (or not threatening enough) to induce a change in behavior, then Country A would violate the law. different (less cynical) reasons for non-compliance include ambiguity of legal rules, where the enforcement provisions are also umbrageous that violating country knows that other nations wouldnt know how to quite respond. Moreover at that place could be limitations on capaci...