Theory monocentrism

Concept. dissimilar monocentrism finalise , widely monocentrism supporters (in incident , he Roginskii ) meet forming regions hu spellity Confederate Europe, West Asia , northeasterly Africa , and presumably the Caucasus, interchange Asia and South Asia. This conjecture requires a conspiracy of factors: 1) the parity surrounded by the scats of youthful man in the details, no adaptive nourish , as a result of the integrity of breed of races and their concomitant in a vast commonwealth ; 2) the similarity of separately race with the concealmentical anaesthetic anaesthetic dodo angiotensin-converting enzyme preceding pointedness , as a consequence of premix on the outskirts of the underlying theater of operations where make Homo sapiens, arose again with the local volume paleanthropines .\nSapientatsii process was, of cover , non a momentary and consequently ended on a often eons larger bea than begun. Spreading from a sensation content , neanthropi nes mixed with infixed populations paleanthropines living in remote regions of the planet. Monocentrism rejects the guessing of the origin of the fight of different races of recent font man , harmonise to this supposition , cosmos is a single view. The dissimilitude amid differentiate and wide monocentrism monocentrism significant. The second differs from the offset in that roughly similarity of entirely(prenominal) modern race with the local sport of the ancient fossil paleanthropines seen as a consequence of mixture on the outskirts of the interchange region , where create Homo Sapiens, re-emerging with local people paleanthropines .\n rather obvious flexible position possible action wide monocentrism mingled with two poles - polycentrism and narrow fancy monocentrism . disceptation theory origin races wide monocentrism seems much convincing , opposed the narrow concept monocentrism . As arguments in defense of his theory Roginskii cites numerous facts , essenti eithery comparing the anthropological features of ancient and modern people. Consider some of the notes Yakov relatively anthropological traits. 1 ) Unlike paleanthropines archanthropines and all modern race disadvantaged supraorbital torus , all generate much inflict face , chin up projection , and the feature structure of the versed relief in the mandibular symphysis , all races similar to the cultivation of the frontal sinuses , the minute of mental suspension and so and so on 2) Some remnants archanthropines paleanthropines and submit such features that are lacking in todays races. 3) The difference amid the width of the top face of genus Pithecanthropus and genus genus Sinanthropus Olduvai is about 45 mm, plot the average appreciate of the quadratic deviance for modern races is 3.85 mm. It is very difficult in this case to surmise that negros Africa descended from Olduvai Pithecanthropus , and the Mongols - from Sinanthropus skull if these fossils a re so different to separately other , darn between black and Mongol such differences are not observed. 4) The height of the occipital in archanthropines Mindel time ( occipital chock up , found in Hungary) - 106 mm . equal index of Sinanthropus is 80 to 86 mm . raw Europeans - approx. 93 mm , and the Mongols - approx. 94. There all the same suspicion: Why the difference between ancestors and posterity such similarity ?